 |
Linux FreeS/WAN - Default branch
|
Section: Unix |
|
|
|
| Added: Tue, Apr 13th 1999 22:23 PDT (9 years, 1 month ago) |
Updated: Mon, Aug 23rd 2004 05:33 PDT (3 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
About:
Linux FreeS/WAN provides IPSEC (IP Security, which is both encryption and authentication) kernel extensions and an IKE (Internet Key Exchange, keying and encrypted routing daemon) as well as various rc scripts and documentation. It is known to interoperate with other IPSEC and IKE system already deployed by other vendors such as OpenBSD, Cisco, or CheckPoint. It also features Opportunistic Encryption, subnet extrusion, and with the appropriate patches interops nicely with Microsoft Windows XP/2000 using X.509 certificates.
Author:
The Free/SWAN project <info __at__ freeswan __dot__ org>
[contact developer]
Homepage:
http://www.freeswan.org/
Tar/GZ:
ftp://ftp.xs4all.nl/pub/crypto/freeswan/
Tar/BZ2:
ftp://ftp.xs4all.nl/[..]pub/crypto/freeswan/freeswan-2.06.tar.gz
RPM package:
ftp://ftp.xs4all.nl/[..]pub/crypto/freeswan/binaries/RedHat-RPMs
Mailing list archive:
https://lists.freeswan.org/
Trove categories:
[change]
Dependencies:
[change]
No dependencies filed
|
|
» Rating:
8.06/10.00
(Rank N/A)
» Vitality: 0.00% (Rank 4761)
» Popularity: 5.99% (Rank 520)

(click to enlarge graphs)
Record hits: 50,500
URL hits: 46,802
Subscribers: 138
|
|
Projects depending on this project:
kvpnc
|
|
Branches
Articles referencing this project
Comments
[»]
Intersting project, but poorly organized and overly-complex install
by danbeck - Sep 6th 2002 16:46:16
The FreeS/WAN project group seems to be poorly organized. At the time of
this comment, their website hadn't been updated since mid February;
version information on the site was three versions behind and their online
documention links did not work.
The install process is overly complex, forcing people to use their special
and sparsely documented Makefile to patch and recompile your kernel.
Excuse me, but I don't need to recompile my kernel, I only need to
recompile the appropriate modules. After some serious searching, I was
able to figure out how I could only make and install the modules
themselves, but that was still broken, failing to copy the appropriate
*.o files to my /lib/modules directories.
What ever happend to giving us sysadmins a patch and allowing us to make
our own choices and decisions?
[reply]
[top]
|
|
 |