Branches
Comments
[»]
mp_core.mpsl
by flipe - Dec 5th 2007 13:57:28
I try to start mp-5.0.0 in a debian-box with gtk-2.12.1-2 and I get this
error.
File 'mp_core.mpsl' not found in INC
what I can do to solve this?
thanks.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: mp_core.mpsl
by Angel Ortega - Dec 7th 2007 08:32:55
> I try to start mp-5.0.0 in a debian-box
> with gtk-2.12.1-2 and I get this error.
>
> File 'mp_core.mpsl' not found in INC
>
> what I can do to solve this?
>
> thanks.
It's hard to know without more information, but I think
it's probably because you are trying to execute it
without installing it (i.e., as ./mp-5). This does not
work, as it reads its components
from /usr[/local]/share/mp-5.
Try installing it. You can always do 'make uninstall' if
you're not happy.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: mp_core.mpsl
by Lucas Lemmens - Jan 13th 2008 12:27:30
>
> % I try to start mp-5.0.0 in a
> debian-box
> % with gtk-2.12.1-2 and I get this
> error.
> %
> % File 'mp_core.mpsl' not found in INC
> %
I had the same error on a ubuntu box when I ran config.sh with the
--debian flag. After re-running config.sh without it and reinstalling it
now runs fine, plus installs to /usr/local instead of in the main tree
which I prefer anyway.
L.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Would be better
by shockzor - Feb 20th 2005 04:42:01
Would be better with a smaller and more suitable font and if it was able to
select text with the mouse.
It says something about an error when you click on cancel on the "run
system command" dialog, which doesnt fell all right.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Would be better
by Angel Ortega - Feb 20th 2005 09:25:36
> Would be better with a smaller and more
> suitable font and if it was able to
> select text with the mouse.
>
> It says something about an error when
> you click on cancel on the "run
> system command" dialog, which
> doesnt fell all right.
Hi! Default fonts are "Mono 14" when using Pango or
"lucidatypewriter 14" without it, so they can arguably
be somewhat larger for some configurations.
Anyway, it's easy to change them in the configuration
file. Also, font size can be zoomed in/out in an
editing session by pressing F11 / F12. Text can be
selected with the mouse, but not in the usual
dragging way, but right-clicking the start and end of
the block.
The 'Error executing command' when cancelling is
certainly a bug; I've just taken note about it.
Thanks for your help,
Angel Ortega
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Would be better
by shockzor - Feb 28th 2005 04:00:35
How come it works so much different from traditional software?
Example, many browsers increase/decrease the font size with ctrl and +/-
instead of F11/F12.
The way to select text is also different from most software.
It would be alot easier if you could just sit down and start to use it
without have to figure out how it works.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Would be better
by Angel Ortega - Mar 5th 2005 01:47:14
> How come it works so much different from
> traditional software?
> Example, many browsers increase/decrease
> the font size with ctrl and +/- instead
> of F11/F12.
> The way to select text is also different
> from most software.
> It would be alot easier if you could
> just sit down and start to use it
> without have to figure out how it works.
It works differently from other software because it's
different :-) Now seriously, I don't think it's THAT
different. Maybe mouse selections are not so usual,
but I don't see the way it works as a stopper.
Regarding font size, you can also change it with
ctrl-keypad-plus and ctrl-keypad-minus (apart from
F11 / F12). Anyway, keybindings are changeable.
There is always somebody that won't like the default
keybindings of your program. Some people even
asked why it does not use vi or emacs keybindings.
Don't like them? Change them.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Syntax Highlighting
by jeffs - Jul 26th 2003 06:33:58
Any chance of providing syntax highlighting for
Python?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Syntax Highlighting
by Angel Ortega - Mar 3rd 2004 07:22:18
> Any chance of providing syntax
> highlighting for
> Python?
As of version 3.2.11, Minimum Profit includes syntax highlighting for
Python.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Syntax Highlighting
by shockzor - Feb 28th 2005 04:02:32
And how about Java and TCL?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Syntax Highlighting
by Angel Ortega - Mar 5th 2005 01:49:23
> And how about Java and TCL?
I don't use those programming languages so I'm not
qualified to add an optimal syntax highlight for them,
but contributions are always welcome.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Review
by Mark Robson - Jan 9th 2003 12:56:39
Builds with no problem and works well. Nice and quick, looks nice.
Unfortunately keyboard shortcuts are not what I expected (are they emacs
ones?) and the menus cannot be used with keyboard (no alt-key to menu, like
gnome apps and nedit, etc)
But the main problem is that there is no undo.
Keep the good work up, it shows promise.
[reply]
[top]
|
