About:
NekoHTML is a simple HTML scanner and tag balancer that enables Java application programmers to parse HTML documents and access the information using standard XML interfaces. The parser can scan HTML files and "fix up" many common mistakes that human (and computer) authors make in writing HTML documents. NekoHTML is written using the Xerces Native Interface (XNI) that is the foundation of the Xerces2 implementation. This enables application programmers to use the NekoHTML parser with existing XNI tools without modification or rewriting code.

Author:
Andy Clark [contact developer]

Rating:	reset 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8.33/10.00 (1 vote)

Homepage:
http://nekohtml.sourceforge.net/
Tar/GZ:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/nekohtml/nekohtml-1.9.6.1.tar.gz
Zip:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/nekohtml/nekohtml-1.9.6.1.zip
Changelog:
http://nekohtml.sourceforge.net/changes.html
CVS tree (cvsweb):
http://nekohtml.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nekohtml/
Bug tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=195122
Mailing list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/[..]chive/forum.php?forum_name=nekohtml-user

Trove categories: [change]

[Intended Audience]		Developers
[License]		The Apache License, The Apache License 2.0
[Programming Language]		Java
[Topic]		Text Processing :: Markup :: HTML/XHTML, Text Processing :: Markup :: XML

Dependencies: [change]
Xerces2 (required)
[download links]

 Branches

Branch	Version	Last release	License	URLs
Default	1.9.6.1	24-Jan-2008	The Apache License 2.0

 Comments

[»] Apache license or Cyberneko license?
by Kreiger - Dec 12th 2003 16:42:00

Which is it? The Apache license or the Cyberneko license? My GPL project with special exception for the Apache license can't use the Cyberneko license, right?

[reply] [top]

[»] Re: Apache license or Cyberneko license?
by Andy Clark - Dec 13th 2003 01:16:19


> Which is it? The Apache license or the
> Cyberneko license? My GPL project with
> special exception for the Apache license
> can't use the Cyberneko license, right?

The CyberNeko license is an Apache-style license. In other words, the wording is exactly the same but the project is not associated with the Apache Software Foundation. So you can use NekoHTML with the same freedom that you use Apache-based software.

[reply] [top]

---

[»] Re: Apache license or Cyberneko license?
by Kreiger - Dec 13th 2003 04:02:22

To be more specific, i'm working for a company which is looking to GPL our software. We are using a couple of Apache libraries, which are under the Apache license. Therefore we include a GPL "special exception" which allows linking with software licensed under "The Apache License". Since CyberNeko is under an Apache-style license, but not "The" Apache License, this special exception would not include the CyberNeko License, right?

[reply] [top]

---

[»] Re: Apache license or Cyberneko license?
by Andy Clark - Dec 22nd 2003 10:12:11


> To be more specific, i'm working for a
> company which is looking to GPL our
> software. We are using a couple of
> Apache libraries, which are under the
> Apache license.
> Therefore we include a GPL "special
> exception" which allows linking with
> software licensed under "The Apache
> License".
> Since CyberNeko is under an Apache-style
> license, but not "The" Apache License,
> this special exception would not include
> the CyberNeko License, right?

Here are a few relevent links for you:

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html
http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html#GPL

Note: The CyberNeko license is based on the Apache version 1.1 license.


[reply] [top]

---

[»] Re: Apache license or Cyberneko license?
by Kreiger - Jan 14th 2004 05:21:43

If anyone is interested, i sent this question to licensing AT gnu DOT org:
> My special exception uses the wording "the Apache license".
> Would i have to change this special exception, and what wording would you recommend to allow for "Apache-style" licenses?

And i got this answer:
> Something like "any license with terms identical to the % Apache license version 1.1 but for names" ought to do it.

[reply] [top]

---