Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
2.13.7
|
Minor bugfixes |
20-Aug-2008 17:47 |
|
2.13.6
|
Minor bugfixes |
06-Aug-2008 10:10 |
|
2.13.5
|
Minor bugfixes |
23-Jul-2008 17:34 |
|
2.13.3
|
Minor feature enhancements |
17-Jun-2008 13:28 |
|
2.13.2
|
Minor bugfixes |
09-Jun-2008 14:27 |
|
2.13.0
|
Minor feature enhancements |
07-Mar-2008 14:08 |
|
2.11.6
|
Minor feature enhancements |
14-Aug-2007 17:39 |
|
2.11.5
|
Minor bugfixes |
04-Jul-2007 10:51 |
|
2.11.4
|
Minor bugfixes |
26-Jun-2007 11:21 |
|
2.11.3
|
Minor feature enhancements |
18-Jun-2007 10:32 |
Articles referencing this project
- Debian: New gtk+2.0 packages fix denial of service
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Mon, Feb 5th 2007 03:34
- Red Hat: Updated gtk2 packages fix a security issue
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Sun, Jan 28th 2007 09:34
- Debian: New gtk+2.0 packages fix several vulnerabilities
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Tue, Nov 29th 2005 07:55
- Red Hat: New gtk2 packages fix a double free vulnerability
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Fri, Apr 1st 2005 07:38
- SuSE: New gtk2 packages fix remote code execution
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Fri, Sep 17th 2004 06:46
|
|
Comments
[»]
Where is gtk-config?
by Andrew E. Guly - Nov 16th 2003 10:58:45
I have installed (from sources) GTK-2.2.4 in /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0, but
some programs can't find it. For exemple, while configuring XMMS:
checking for gtk-config... (cached)
/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/bin/gtk-config
checking for GTK - version >= 1.2.2... ./configure:
/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/bin/gtk-config: No such file or directory
./configure: /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/bin/gtk-config: No such file or
directory
./configure: /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/bin/gtk-config: No such file or
directory
./configure: /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/bin/gtk-config: No such file or
directory
./configure: /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/bin/gtk-config: No such file or
directory
no
*** Could not run GTK test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK was incorrectly
installed
*** or that you have moved GTK since it was installed. In the latter case,
you
*** may want to edit the gtk-config script:
/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/bin/gtk-config
configure: error: *** GTK+ >= 1.2.2 not installed - please install
first ***
What wrong? Where is gtk-config?
Sorry, if my English scare you...
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Where is gtk-config?
by muppet - Mar 10th 2004 06:05:24
> What wrong? Where is gtk-config?
gtk-config was part of gtk+-1.x. gtk+-2.x uses pkg-
config instead. if your app wants gtk-config, it wants
gtk+-1.x and its devel packages.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Accessing menubar from keyboard
by Chaotic Thought - Dec 9th 2002 20:49:27
One thing I can't stand about GTK is that there is no apparant way to
access the menubar (e.g. File Edit etc) if the programmer has not included
shortcuts for this. (e.g. LinNeighborhood, VMWare, Everybuddy)
In Qt and Windows, this has always been possible. Tapping Alt opens the
menubar no matter what in these GUI toolkits.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Win32?
by Zak0 - May 14th 2002 22:23:18
What happened to the Win32 port of GTK+ ?? I was hoping to start
development on a cross-platform application for Win32 and Linux using GTK+
for my GUI toolkit. But, I can't find a place to download the Win32 port
ANYWHERE (www.gimp.org/win32 has been down for days). Anyone have a copy
of it?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Looks like the web page is down
by Sam Trenholme - Mar 8th 2002 18:52:46
Hello there,
I ryesterday have undergone the process of converting the encoding on my
system for international characters from iso 8859-1 (which limits me to
characters in English and western Europian languages) to UTF-8 (Unicode;
which allows character encodings in just about every single written
language that people have conceived in the history of mankind).
I noticed that GTK 1.2.x had no support for utf-8; when I set the encoding
to UTF-8, GTK 1.2.x was still encoding directory names as if they were in
iso 8859-1; and, in fact, eould crash when trying to enter a UTF-8 encoded
directory name.
After doing a web search on UTF-8 and GTK, I found out that the
development branch of GTK has UTF-8 support. Alas, www.gtk.org has been
down all day, and, looking at the freshmeat record, there does not appear
to be any development with GTK since last summer.
What is the current status of GTK and UTF-8 support?
- Sam
[reply]
[top]
[»]
The web page is up again
by Sam Trenholme - Mar 11th 2002 15:27:10
OK, the gtk.org web page is up again, and there is a GTK 2.0 out there,
which I am sure has decent UTF-8 support.
I will be downloading this version of GTK shortly.
- Sam
[reply]
[top]
[»]
sugestion
by Mariusz Gniazdowski - Dec 30th 2001 09:44:32
I love GTK. Butt many others think that it does not look good... Why?
Because in most (all?) distributios default GTK theme is simple and not to
attractive. Well we can change it to very beautyfull ones, butt many people
dont know that. When they use other desktop than Gnome, they do not open
Gnome-control center and do not know that this is possible. Thats all
8)
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Not so fast!
by Felipe Bergo - Feb 17th 2000 00:44:13
Yes, GTK+ is great and the development is going at good speed, but this
is 1.2.7, not 1.2.27 (as appeared in the news page).
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Can't get programs to recognize GTK+-1.2.0
by dr0z - Apr 23rd 1999 07:29:12
I resently d/l the Enlightenment WM v0.15.5 and I wanted the e-conf
program, but it needs gnome-libs so i d/l that when I tried to compile it,
it said that i needed gtk+-1.2.0, which i have. It gave me an error about
the libraries not matching the header files. Headers= v1.0.2 and
Libraries=v1.2.0
What should I do to resolve the problem?
Thanks
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Can't get programs to recognize GTK+-1.2.0
by here - Mar 6th 2001 12:17:06
> I resently d/l the Enlightenment WM
> v0.15.5 and I wanted the e-conf program,
> but it needs gnome-libs so i d/l that
> when I tried to compile it, it said that
> i needed gtk+-1.2.0, which i have. It
> gave me an error about the libraries not
> matching the header files. Headers=
> v1.0.2 and Libraries=v1.2.0
>
> What should I do to resolve the
> problem?
>
> Thanks
a couple of things :
the tarballs generally install to /usr/local/
whereas (for example) redhat installs stuff under
/usr. configure is probably still looking at the
one in /usr.
to fix this: rm /usr/bin/gtk-config
make sure /usr/local/bin is on your
path
and /usr/local/lib is in
/etc/ld.so.conf
before running configure you should be able to
type `gtk-config --version` and it should return
with the version number you just installed.
alternately, you can reinstall the gtk pacakges
and glib under /usr by doing
'configure --prefix=/usr' but you have to
remember to do that for all the pacakges and it
seems like most packages want to go under /usr/local/.
hope it helps
rob
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Can't get programs to recognize GTK+-1.2.0
by token - Feb 5th 2004 14:09:35
Hi Rob, you seem to know what you're doing so I'm hoping you can help me
out. I've installed gtk+-2.2.4 from source and removed my old gtk-config
beforehand, but now I can't find gtk-config anywhere on my system. Have I
done something wrong? I used all the default options when installing
i.e ./configure
make
su
make install
and gtk was installed in /usr/local
no sign of gtk-config though!
I'm tearing my hair out over this one! (I'm trying to get gimp2.0pre2
installed without much success!)
>
> % I resently d/l the Enlightenment WM
> % v0.15.5 and I wanted the e-conf
> program,
> % but it needs gnome-libs so i d/l that
> % when I tried to compile it, it said
> that
> % i needed gtk+-1.2.0, which i have.
> It
> % gave me an error about the libraries
> not
> % matching the header files. Headers=
> % v1.0.2 and Libraries=v1.2.0
> %
> % What should I do to resolve the
> % problem?
> %
> % Thanks
>
>
>
> a couple of things :
> the tarballs generally install to
> /usr/local/
> whereas (for example) redhat installs
> stuff under
> /usr. configure is probably still
> looking at the
> one in /usr.
>
> to fix this: rm /usr/bin/gtk-config
> make sure /usr/local/bin
> is on your
> path
> and /usr/local/lib is in
> /etc/ld.so.conf
>
> before running configure you should be
> able to
> type `gtk-config --version` and it
> should return
> with the version number you just
> installed.
>
> alternately, you can reinstall the gtk
> pacakges
> and glib under /usr by doing
> 'configure --prefix=/usr' but you have
> to
> remember to do that for all the pacakges
> and it
> seems like most packages want to go
> under /usr/local/.
>
> hope it helps
> rob
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Can't get programs to recognize GTK+-1.2.0
by here - Feb 7th 2004 00:14:49
> Hi Rob, you seem to know what you're
> doing so I'm hoping you can help me out.
> I've installed gtk+-2.2.4 from source
> and removed my old gtk-config
> beforehand, but now I can't find
> gtk-config anywhere on my system. Have
> I done something wrong? I used all the
> default options when installing
> i.e ./configure
> make
> su
> make install
>
> and gtk was installed in /usr/local
>
> no sign of gtk-config though!
>
> I'm tearing my hair out over this one!
> (I'm trying to get gimp2.0pre2 installed
> without much success!)
the directions above are outdated wrt gtk2.0
which now uses pkg-config (a generalization of gtk-config). you therefore
don't need to mess with
the gtk-config stuff.
your problem probably still has to do with the /usr vs /usr/local/
business. you might want to install gtk (et.al.) with 'configure
--prefix=/usr' or you might want to mess with your pkg-config
path...perhaps 'export
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$PKG_CONFIG_PATH:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig'
good luck.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
ARgh...
by Shaman - Jan 19th 1999 11:00:17
The last few releases of GTK/GLIB totally refuse to work on my Solaris
boxes. I get segmentation faults each time.
--
Incurred fault #6, FLTBOUNDS %pc = 0x00000000
siginfo: SIGSEGV SEGV_MAPERR addr=0x00000000
Received signal #11, SIGSEGV [default]
siginfo: SIGSEGV SEGV_MAPERR addr=0x00000000
*** process killed ***
--
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: ARgh...
by tdowd - Dec 1st 2006 10:29:09
>>our problem probably still has to do with the /usr vs /usr/
local/ business. you might want to install gtk (et.al.) with
'configure --prefix=/usr'
i've been trying to install GImageViewer on Suse 10.1 for
more than a day now... this advice was all I needed. Thank
you so much!
[reply]
[top]
|
